|
From the publishers of THE HINDU VOL. 25 :: NO. 29 :: Jul. 20 - 26, 2002 |
![]() |
|||
|
CRICKET/NATWEST TROPHY
England halts India's winning streakG. VISWANATHAFTER a loss to Sri Lanka in the previous match, England bounced back and won by 64 runs against India in the NatWest Trophy III triseries. England's good showing at the Oval against India could be due to Hussain's remarks at Manchester where England was beaten by 23 runs.
N. SRIDHARAN It was a convincing win for England in the six league matches, one of which could not be completed at Chester-Le-Street, Durham, because of rain. There was threat of rain at the Oval too, when England was looking forward to victory before the final at Lord's. When the teams reached Kennington Oval, they expected rain to stop the play. Plastic sheets were used to protect the square area and the bowler's run up. Many predicted that the match would be washed out. But later, Ronnie Irani and Andrew Flintoff belted the ball around, especially Irani had a great time. All the threat of a downpour cleared in a few hours. Well, then, this was fickle English weather. But in the end, it was a dream run for Irani. The match officials were confident that 25 overs would be played in order to provide entertainment to the spectators. Those who had tickets and did not make it to the venue missed a fine allround show by Irani. Teams are not really comfortable playing a shortened game, because setting a target is tough. It happened to India once. One cannot fault Sourav Ganguly for asking England to bat. His decision was based on the outcome of the previous match his team played against Sri Lanka. Then the seamers played a major role and the batsmen struggled. But the pitch turned out to be different and was batsmen friendly with Irani, Flintoff and Michael Vaughan making merry. The three English batsmen hit some stupendous shots and it must be said that the Indians wilted.
N. SRIDHARAN Sri Lanka, with Sanath Jayasuriya in the forefront made 240 in 32 overs in the first shortened game of the triseries. England made eleven short of that. Yet, to make 229 off 192 deliveries was a feat of sorts. England could not have complained. Hussain had sent five of his top batsmen, considered to be big hitters, to destroy the bowling. Except for Marcus Trescothick, the others did not fail. "It was a difficult situation this morning to leave out Graham Thorpe and Jeremy Snape. But now we know that we will be going into the final with all 15 players available and all of them having contributed to the team," said the English captain. With four wins in four matches, India's confidence level was at a high, but each and every England player on the field was prepared to do his best for a victory. Hussain was smart. After the fielding restriction was over, after the ninth over, he positioned five men protecting the boundary. This stopped Tendulkar hitting fours. The departure of India's captain to a ugly looking shot brought in Venkatsai Laxman for the first time in the competition. It was asking too much from Laxman to speed up the run rate. England was an inspired lot with Darren Gough and Alex Tudor bowling good opening spells and Irani coming into the picture to bottle up things and take wickets.
N. SRIDHARAN Sehwag took his chances before Alec Stewart held the first of his three catches. "Ronnie is not a slow bowler. I have always felt that Alec is one of the three best specialist wicketkeepers in England, and I am not forgetting his batting," said the English skipper. There was an element of doubt in the decision handed out to Yuveraj Singh, by third umpire Neil Mallender. The Indian was declared out, stumped by Stewart off Irani. But England was on top, thanks to the combined effort of Irani and Stewart. India was out of reckoning after the exit of Sehwag and if there was some interest, it was only because of the presence of Tendulkar, who hit a few lovely shots, but while chancing his arm against Matthew Hoggard, he edged to Stewart. It was a day when England really fired the big shots and confronted India with all its might. Ganguly admitted that England played better cricket. Hussain said that this victory was important. The scores: England: M. Trescothick b Kumble 9; N. Knight c Kaif b Yuveraj 31; R. Irani b Kumble 53; A. Flintoff c Nehra b Agarkar 51; M. Vaughan c Yuveraj b Khan 30; N. Hussain c Kaif b Khan 6; P. Collingwood b Nehra 9; A. Stewart b Khan 0; A. Tudor (not out) 3; D. Gough (not out) 7; Extras (lb-6, nb-6, w-18) 30. Total (for eight wickets in 32 overs) 229. Fall of wickets: 1-52, 2-72, 3-148, 4-196, 5-202, 6-219, 7-219, 8-219. India bowling: Nehra 5-0-28-1, Khan 7-0-53-3, Kumble 7-0-39-2, Agarkar 4-0-38-1, Yuveraj 6-0-37-1, Sehwag 1-0-9-0, Ganguly 1-0-10-0, Tendulkar 1-0-9-0.
AP India: S. Ganguly c Flintoff b Tudor 6; V. Sehwag c Stewart b Irani 46; V. V. S. Laxman c Hoggard b Collingwood 14; S. R. Tendulkar c Stewart b Hoggard 36; Yuveraj Singh st. Stewart b Irani 5; M. Kaif b Irani 1; A. Ratra c Stewart b Irani 2; A. B. Agarkar c Collingwood b Irani 0; A. Kumble (not out) 21; Z. Khan c Gough b Flintoff 2; A. Nehra c Irani b Tudor 24; Extras (lb-1, w-7) 8. Total (in 29.1 overs) 165. Fall of wickets: 1-31, 2-62, 3-78, 4-100, 5-114, 6-118, 7-118, 8-120, 9-127. England bowling: Gough 4-0-19-0, Tudor 4.1-0-30-2, Flintoff 4-0-33-1, Irani 7-1-26-5, Collingwood 5-0-31-1, Hoggard 5-0-25-0.
Contents Daily Sports The Hindu Business Line Frontline Home Copyright © 2002 The Sportstar Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Sportstar. |
|||||